Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Essay on The Legend of Nandan

The play "The Legend of Nandan" is a pungent attack on the regressive forces of the caste- ridden society. The dramatist deconstructs the legend to satires the oppressive caste system which does not allow the
upward mobility. It is a play espousing the Dalit cause, the cause of the oppressed and
downtrodden classes and castes. Contemporary Dalit leadership can find a forerunner in Nandan's voice.
Indira Parthasarathy's play graphically dramatizes such a state of affairs prevailing in Nandan's
time. Even in this 21st century, things have not completely changed. Casteism is a chronic disease that affects the mindset of the individuals and groups, which is a menace to the
humanity. Discrimination, caste bias,
and antisocial activities in the name of religion are still
prevalent in every nook and corner of our society hampering the growth of humanity. Indira
Parthasarathy recreates the story of Nandan, the marginalized by humanizing the tough war
hero by highlighting his emotional drama in this compelling work that brings Nandan to life.
Indira Parthasarathy has desacralized the very canonization of Nandan. Through his play, he
exposes the bitter truth of how casteism sets human ablaze turning humanity into ashes.

Nandan's subversion is cleverly contained by a gruesome plan devised by the cunning Brahmin Vediyar, prompted by the Mudaliyar and Udaiyar. These upper-caste men feel threatened not by Nandan's insubordination, but by his unwavering piety. The play depicts how they manipulate Nandan's devotion to Lord Nataraja, convincing him that he is destined for redemption and is superior to his fellow Paraiyahs. Nandan is led to believe he can perform miracles by God's grace, and though he is terrified by this prospect, he is too entrenched in the situation to turn back.

On a predetermined day, before a large crowd, Nandan and Abirami enter a fire, to the alarm of the Paraiyahs who witness the scene. The upper-caste men hail Nandan as sanctified and urge the other Paraiyahs to follow his example. However, the Paraiyahs flee in terror, hearing the agonizing cries of Nandan and Abirami as they burn. Nandan enters the fire only to become a victim of the establishment, which ultimately prevails.

The fire consumes Nandan, turning him into ashes. Nandan symbolizes every Dalit struggling to reclaim their dignity as human beings. In his attempt to assimilate into Brahminical culture, Nandan pays a dear price—his life and that of his beloved.

According to the legend, Nandan purifies himself in the fire of self-immolation, shedding the sin of his lowly birth. After this act, he is reborn as a saint with a sacred thread on his chest. However, in Indira Parthasarathy's portrayal, Nandan is depicted as an ordinary man manipulated by Brahmins into believing that his devotion would grant him extraordinary powers. Misled, Nandan immolates himself seeking salvation, but instead, he perishes in the flames.

The dramatist highlights that similar exploitation continues to affect marginalized individuals in Indian society today. Parthasarathy emphasizes that the term "Brahmin" in this context does not refer to a specific, immutable caste but rather to any hegemonic force at a given time. He uses Nandan's story to critique social inequity, introducing characters such as the Brahmin (Vediyar) and other upper-caste Hindus like the Mudhaliyar and Udaiyar. These characters represent vested interests working to prevent the social advancement of the untouchables.

Parthasarathy also depicts Nandan's master as a degenerate feudal landowner, a familiar figure in colonial India, illustrating the entrenched power dynamics and resistance to change from those benefiting from the existing social order.

The Role of Nandan 
In Indira Parthasarathy's "The Legend of Nandan," the character of Nandan is depicted as a complex and tragic figure. Here are key aspects of his character:

1. Devotion and Piety: Nandan is portrayed as deeply devout, with an unwavering commitment to his faith and the worship of Lord Nataraja. His piety is a central aspect of his identity, shaping his actions and decisions throughout the narrative.

2. Naïveté and Manipulation: Despite his strong faith, Nandan is portrayed as somewhat naive, easily manipulated by the upper-caste characters, particularly the Brahmin Vediyar, Mudaliyar, and Udaiyar. They exploit his devotion, making him believe that his spiritual practices and piety could elevate him above his social status as a Paraiyah.

3. Tragic Victim: 
Nandan becomes a tragic victim of the power dynamics and caste hierarchy within the society. He is led to believe that his devotion could lead to miraculous abilities and salvation, but this belief ultimately leads him to a fatal end. His self-immolation, driven by a false sense of spiritual transcendence, symbolizes the exploitation and manipulation faced by marginalized communities.

4. Symbol of Social Critique: Through Nandan's story, Parthasarathy critiques the social inequities and rigid caste structures in Indian society. Nandan's tragic fate is used to highlight the destructive power of societal norms and the exploitation of religious devotion by those in power.

5. Representation of Dalit Struggles: Nandan's character represents the broader struggles of Dalits (formerly untouchables) in India. His desire to attain spiritual purity and societal acceptance reflects the broader quest for dignity and equality among marginalized groups. His tragic end serves as a commentary on the systemic barriers that prevent social mobility and justice.

Nandan is a poignant figure whose life and death reflect the broader themes of exploitation, social inequality, and the quest for dignity within the context of India's caste system.

The Legend of Nandan is a play by Indira Parthasarathy that explores the life and transformation of Nandan, a historical and mythical figure in South Indian culture. The play delves into themes of caste, spirituality, and social justice. Here is a brief summary act by act:

Act I:
Introduction and Background: The play opens by introducing Nandan, a low-caste devotee of Lord Shiva, living in a society that strictly enforces caste hierarchies. The act sets the stage for the social and religious tensions present in Nandan's community.

Nandan's Devotion: We see Nandan's deep devotion to Shiva, which transcends the constraints imposed by his caste. His faith and piety are so strong that they attract the attention of both the gods and the higher-caste people in his village.

Act II:
Conflict and Transformation: As Nandan's devotion grows, he faces increasing opposition from the orthodox Brahmins, who are threatened by the idea of a low-caste person expressing such profound spirituality. Nandan experiences a spiritual transformation, feeling a divine call to break free from the societal norms that limit him.

Divine Test and Miracle: Nandan's faith is tested through a divine miracle. The gods, moved by his devotion, appear to him and grant him a vision or a boon that symbolizes his spiritual elevation. This act emphasizes the universality of divine grace, challenging the caste-based discrimination in society.
Act III:
Rejection and Acceptance: Despite divine intervention, Nandan faces rejection from the orthodox community. However, his unwavering devotion and the miracle lead some to reconsider their views. This act often highlights a turning point where Nandan's spiritual purity and the strength of his faith begin to transcend societal boundaries.

- **Climax and Resolution**: The play reaches its climax as Nandan's story becomes a powerful testament to the equality of all beings in the eyes of the divine. The narrative may resolve with Nandan's ultimate acceptance into the spiritual fold, either by the community or by achieving a form of spiritual liberation or enlightenment.

The play is a rich tapestry of cultural, religious, and social commentary, highlighting the transformative power of faith and the need for social justice. The story of Nandan serves as an allegory for challenging oppressive systems and advocating for a more inclusive and equitable society.

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Essay on Her Garden by Meena Alexander

Meena Alexander's poem "Her Garden" is an emotional meditation on memory, heritage, and the intertwining of personal and familial history. The poem vividly conjures an image of the poet's grandmother and the landscape she inhabited, particularly the garden with its gnarled mulberry trees. The physicality of the garden, with its "gnarled" trees and the bristling cicada, mirrors the grandmother's own aging body, suggesting a deep connection between the natural world and human life.

 

The imagery of the poem is rich and textured, with the mountains "crackling" and the trees seemingly alive, "clambering out of their bark" and "swimming" to a distant, barren rock. This surrealistic vision evokes a sense of transition and impermanence, as if the garden—and by extension, the grandmother—exists in a liminal space between life and death, presence and absence.

 

The poet imagines her grandmother's death as a peaceful, almost unnoticed event, "her face set heavenward / exacting little attention / from the sun." This quiet departure contrasts with the "finicky chaos" of the setting sun, emphasizing the grandmother's serene exit from the world. The idea that she "crept into her soul / and slept" suggests a return to a more elemental state, a merging with the earth and sky.

 

The poem concludes with the speaker reflecting on the deep, almost mystical connection she feels with her grandmother, despite never having known her in life. This bond transcends time, making the poet and her grandmother "one, entirely," united in a shared sense of loss and longing. The final lines evoke a "bleakness beneath my dreams," but also a "rare fragrance," a reminder of the enduring presence of the past in the poet's life. The image of the "dry mulberry / pierced by this monsoon wind" suggests both fragility and resilience, a fitting metaphor for the legacy of the grandmother and the lasting impact of memory.



Short Essay
"Her Garden" by Meena Alexander is a reflective poem that explores themes of memory, loss, and the passage of time through the metaphor of a garden. In the poem, the speaker recalls a garden that once belonged to a woman, possibly a loved one, now absent. The garden is depicted as a place of beauty and life, filled with flowers and plants, which serve as symbols of the woman's presence and the memories associated with her.

As the speaker walks through the garden, they notice the changes that have occurred over time, such as flowers wilting or the growth of new plants. These changes evoke a sense of nostalgia and a recognition of the impermanence of life. The garden, while still beautiful, is no longer the same as it once was, mirroring the changes in the speaker's life and emotions.

The poem poignantly captures the inevitable transformations that come with time and the lingering impact of those who have left a mark on our lives. It highlights the idea that while physical presence may fade, the memories and influence of a person can continue to live on in the spaces and places they once inhabited.

Monday, July 29, 2024

Essay on Elaine Showalter's "Towards a Feminist Poetics"

Elaine Showalter's essay "Towards a Feminist Poetics," published in 1979, is a seminal work in the field of feminist literary criticism. In this essay, Showalter aims to lay the groundwork for a comprehensive approach to understanding women's literature. She distinguishes between two primary methodologies in feminist criticism: the feminist critique, which examines how women are portrayed in literature written by men, and gynocritics, which focuses on the study of women as writers and the unique qualities of women's writing.

Showalter's work is notable for proposing a framework that considers the historical and cultural contexts of women's literature, identifying distinct phases in the development of a female literary tradition. Through this exploration, she challenges the marginalization of women's voices in literature and advocates for the recognition of a rich and diverse female literary heritage. The essay is a call to broaden the scope of literary criticism to include and prioritize the experiences and perspectives of women, thus advancing the field of feminist poetics.

Elaine Showalter's essay "Towards a Feminist Poetics" is a foundational text in feminist literary criticism. 
Gynocritics and Feminist Critique:
Feminist Critique: This approach examines literature from a feminist perspective, focusing on how women are portrayed in male-authored texts and how literature reflects societal attitudes towards women.Gynocritics: Showalter introduces the concept of gynocritics, which focuses on the study of women's writing and explores the female literary tradition. This includes analyzing women's writing styles, themes, and the social conditions under which women write.Phases of Women's Writing:Showalter identifies three phases in the history of women's literature:
Feminine Phase (1840-1880): Women writers imitate the dominant male literary tradition and internalize the standards of male culture.
Feminist Phase (1880-1920): Women protest against their lack of rights and challenge male-dominated narratives and literary conventions.
Female Phase (1920-present): Women seek to establish an independent female tradition, focusing on female experience and expressing unique perspectives.The Importance of a Female Literary Tradition:Showalter argues that women writers often face challenges due to their marginalization in a male-dominated literary world. By studying women’s literature, scholars can uncover a distinct female literary tradition and understand the specific experiences and concerns of women.
Biological, Linguistic, and Cultural Models:Showalter discusses different approaches to studying women’s writing:
Biological Model: Focuses on the body and how women's physical experiences shape their writing.
Linguistic Model: Examines language and style, exploring whether there is a distinctive female language or discourse.
Cultural Model: Looks at the broader cultural and social factors that influence women’s writing, such as gender roles, class, and race.
Challenges and Critiques:Showalter acknowledges the diversity within feminist literary criticism and the potential issues, such as the risk of essentialism or assuming a unified "female experience." She emphasizes the need for inclusivity and intersectionality, recognizing the varied experiences of women across different cultures and contexts.
Intersectionality and Diversity: Showalter acknowledges the diversity of women's experiences and emphasizes the need for feminist literary criticism to be inclusive of different racial, cultural, and socioeconomic backgrounds. She warns against essentialism, which risks oversimplifying or homogenizing women's experiences
Conclusion:The essay advocates for a feminist poetics that is inclusive and open to various interpretations of women’s literature. Showalter calls for a critical framework that not only analyzes women's writing but also promotes it as a vital and dynamic part of the literary landscape.

Tuesday, October 17, 2023

Beyond the Horizon Essay

 

Beyond the Horizon was Eugene O’Neill’s first full-length play to merit production. Set in and around the Mayo farm, the play chronicles the story of Robert and Andrew, two brothers closely allied to each another but totally disparate. Andrew is the born farmer, “husky, sun-bronzed son of the soil,” while Robert is the dreamer with a “touch of the poet about him, delicate of feature and refined.”

As the curtain rises, Robert is sitting on the property’s fence line contemplating the horizon in the distance. He has long dreamed of leaving the farm and traveling so he will not take root in any one place. This, in fact, is his last night on the farm, as he will embark the next morning to sail with his uncle, Captain Dick Scott, on the bark Sunda, finally having the opportunity to visit the exotic places that he has only dreamed and read about. A brief interchange with Andrew solidifies the established roles each brother has assumed in the family. Clearly each has different dreams and aspirations respectfully supported by the other. Ruth Atkins now appears. Although Ruth is engaged to Andrew, Robert confesses his love for her on the eve of his departure. Likewise, Ruth confides that she has also loved him for many years and was only settling for Andrew because it seemed that Robert was not interested in her. Reassured that “love” must be the “secret calling him from over the world’s rim—the secret beyond every horizon,” Robert decides that their love is “sweeter than any distant dream.” He will stay and work the farm with Ruth at his side.

The next scene reveals to the family the recent events between Ruth and Robert that the audience has just witnessed. Andrew, upset and jilted, makes the hasty decision to accompany his uncle in Robert’s place. The father, James Mayo, diligently attempts to persuade his oldest son not to go as he believes Andrew is defying his own nature and will be sorry if he proceeds. Andrew defies his father, leaves with his uncle, and yet harbors no ill will toward his brother.

The remaining two acts of the play depict the deterioration of the farm, the relationship of Robert and Ruth, and Robert’s health. There is an eight-year lapse between the end of act 1 and the beginning of act 3. Not having the skills for farming that his brother possesses, Robert is not successful in his efforts, as hard as he tries. In the two years since James Mayo’s death, the farm is heading for ruin. Mrs. Mayo says Robert cannot help this deterioration, but Mrs. Atkins, Ruth’s mother, retorts that there is no point in Robert’s working hard if his hard work does not accomplish anything. Moreover, in these three years, Ruth has discovered that all that charmed her about her husband no longer holds the same allure. Mary, their daughter, is as irritable and sickly as Robert. Ruth, now seeing his “true self,” insists that if she could have seen it earlier she would have killed herself before she would have married him. This revelation embitters Robert even more, and he continues to let the farm deteriorate.

With hope, each looks to the homecoming of Andrew. Having finished his three-year apprenticeship on the Sunda , Andrew wants to help but has lost money on ill-advised land speculation and must travel to Argentina to recoup his losses. He promises that once that is accomplished he will return and help restore the farm to its former glory.

Robert Mayo (Rob) is the tragic hero of the play, and when he first appears in the opening scene, the stage directions describe him as “a tall, slender young man of about twenty-three. There is a touch of the poet about him” (126). Rob’s features are also “delicate and refined” (126), immediately marking him out as unsuitable for physical farm labor. A dreamer with a vivid imagination, Rob is characterized as the opposite of his strong, outdoorsy brother, Andy. After a sickly childhood that kept him stuck at home, Rob dreams of seeing the world beyond the horizon and exploring all of the places that he read about in books. His decision to cancel his sea voyage to marry Ruth and stay on the farm is the impetus for the tragic chain of events, spurring Andy to take his place on Uncle Scott’s ship.

Rob’s marriage is doomed from the outset; Ruth is not a suitable match for him and was only won over by his poetry and romanticized storytelling. In addition, Rob is not a natural farmer like Andy, and the family farm soon starts to fail under his care. Rob’s poor efforts see him mocked by the local farmhands.

Dreams, and the tragic consequences of denying them, is a central themes in the play. Many characters have dreams that end up unfulfilled—James Mayo dreams his son Andy will take over the running of the family farm, while Ruth dreams of a romantic and idealized marriage. However, the biggest dreamers are the Mayo brothers, Rob and Andy.

Symbol

The eponymous horizon is a significant, recurring motif that informs the central theme of dreams and the choice to pursue or deny them. The light brimming over the rim of the horizon symbolizes both the promise and allure of dreams but also the difficulty in closing the distance between a future dream and the present situation. Rob, in particular, is drawn to the horizon—for him it represents the opportunity, freedom, and adventure that he craves after a sickly childhood spent confined indoors. At the start of the play, Rob describes how he feels drawn to the horizon and his “need of the freedom of great wide spaces, the joy of wandering on and on—in quest of the secret, which is hidden over there, beyond the horizon” (129). However, Rob stays on the farm and never moves any closer to discovering the secret that he imagines is waiting to be discovered beyond the hills. Each act of the play features an outdoors scene in which the horizon is in the background: a constant reminder of Rob’s failure to pursue his dreams.

Rob suffered from long periods of illness as a child and spent a lot of time indoors, staring out at the hills and thinking about what lay beyond the horizon: “Those were the only happy moments of my life then, dreaming there at the window” (133). Rob was physically restricted by his bodily ailments, so he allowed his mind and imagination to wander freely by inventing amazing spaces inhabited by magical beings. As Rob develops into an adult and grows stronger, the dream of journeying beyond the hills and seeing the reality of “all the wonders of the world” that he believes are waiting there remains “as alluring as ever” (133). At the beginning of the play, Rob tells Ruth that his planned voyage is “keeping that promise of long ago” and a fulfilment of his childhood dream (133).

First Act

The play opens onto the outdoor setting of the Mayo family farm at sunset. A road runs through the farm, between the hills and ploughed fields, toward the horizon. Rob Mayo is reading a book. He is a young man of around 23 years old, with delicate features and “a touch of the poet about him” (126). Rob’s elder brother, Andy Mayo, enters. At 27, Andy is the opposite of Rob. Tall, strong, and tanned from working the fields, Andy is “a son of the soil” (126). The brothers are close, despite their differences, which they joke about.

It is revealed that this is Rob’s last night before he is due to join his uncle’s ship and set sail for three years. Rob had a sickly childhood that forced him to stay indoors, and he has always dreamed of adventure and believes the voyage will help further improve his health. Rob repeatedly gestures or references the horizon as he tries to describe this desire to Andy, who can’t imagine leaving the farm because of his deep love for the land.

Act II begins three years later in the same sitting room of the Mayo’s farmhouse. The home hasn’t changed too much, but there is an atmosphere of neglect about the place. Mrs. Atkins and Kate Mayo are discovered sat together, with Mrs. Atkins complaining that Rob is late for his dinner again. It is revealed that in the interceding years, Rob and Ruth have married and had a sickly daughter called Mary. Meanwhile, James Mayo died two years earlier. Mrs. Atkins criticizes their children, especially Rob, whom she blames for running the farm poorly. Kate hopelessly tries to defend Rob and says luck has been against him, but Rob is not the natural farmer that his father and brother were.

 

Mrs. Atkins is outraged that Rob is planning to mortgage the farm to raise some money, but Kate passively accepts and says Rob will manage until Andy gets back. Lamenting that James never had the opportunity to see Andy again and forgive him, Kate blames James’s stubbornness and pride for causing his death. Mrs. Atkins takes a keen interest in Andy’s imminent return and claims he would have been a better match for Ruth.

The final act opens five years later, once again in the Mayo farmhouse. The home is even more dilapidated—it looks dirty and uncared for. Both Mrs. Mayo and Mary have died in the intervening years, and Ruth, who has “aged horribly” (175), is sat up late by the stove with her sleeping mother. Rob enters looking emaciated; he is clearly ill. Ruth and Rob discuss Andy’s imminent visit, and Rob is annoyed that Ruth has told his brother he is sick with “lung trouble” (177). The couple argue about Rob’s illness, and Rob experiences flashes of jealousy toward Andy, who he feels has made a comparative success of his life. Rob reflects on how hard the last few years have been for he and Ruth, especially Mary’s death, although both believe that Mary is fortunate to be dead rather than having to face their current situation.  Rob feverishly tells Ruth about his dreams of a new life for them both in the city once he’s well, and how he hopes to make a living from writing. Rob thinks Ruth’s reluctance to go with him is because she still loves Andy, and his anger brings on a coughing fit. Ruth agrees to go with Rob to soothe him, but she fears he has gone mad.


 

Act 1, Scene 2

Later that night, Andy sits with his father James, his mother Kate, and her brother Captain Dick Scott, who is telling an old sea story. Everybody else is distracted and sad over the thought of Robert’s leaving. Robert, meanwhile, has gone with Ruth to wheel her mother home. Andy leaves to check on one of the cows, and Mr. Mayo tells the others he hopes that Andy and Ruth get married, since the Atkins farm is next door to the Mayo farm, and Andy could manage both. Mrs. Mayo says that she does not think Ruth loves Andy. Robert walks in and announces that he is canceling his voyage, since Ruth has told him she loves him. Everybody is glad except Scott, who is losing a shipmate, and Andy, who has been quietly listening from the doorway. Andy forces a smile and congratulates Robert, then says that he is going to take Robert’s place on the voyage. Scott is overjoyed, but Mr. Mayo is shocked and accuses Andy of running away because Ruth did not choose him. Andy lies, saying that he hates the farm and wants to get away. His father disowns him and storms out. Robert knows Andy’s decision is because of Ruth but says that if he were in Andy’s place, he would do the same thing.

 

Act 2, Scene 1

Three years later, the signs of neglect on the farm are evident from the condition of the farmhouse. Mrs. Mayo and Mrs. Atkins sit at the table, talking about Robert’s mismanagement of both farms, Andy’s expected arrival, and whether or not Mr. Mayo forgave Andy before he died. Both women agree that Ruth and Andy would have made a better match. Ruth, who looks much older after three years, comes in with Mary, her sickly child. All three women talk about Andy, whom they expect will stay to help renovate the farm. Mrs. Atkins and Mrs. Mayo go outside to escape the heat of the farmhouse. Robert comes in, and they argue about Robert not eating dinner, Ruth’s pining over Andy’s letters, Mary not taking a nap, and Robert’s preference for books instead of work. Ben, the farmhand, comes in, announcing that he is quitting because he is embarrassed to work on such a poor farm. Robert and Ruth have a vicious fight, telling each other that their marriage has been a mistake. Robert says he wishes he had gone to sea, and Ruth says that she loves Andy and wishes Robert would leave. Andy arrives.

 

Act 2, Scene 2

Later that day, Robert sits on a boulder on the farm, gazing off toward the horizon. Andy comes up and says he is giving up his career at sea to move to Argentina and invest in the lucrative grain business

 

in Buenos Aires. Robert is dismayed that Andy is not staying on at the Mayo farm, and they talk about the farm’s bad condition. Andy offers to give his savings to Robert to save the farm, but Robert refuses and becomes infuriated. Ruth stops by and it is evident that she has put on makeup and gotten dressed up for Andy. Ruth sends Robert and Mary away on a work task and tells Andy that she cannot wait until he takes over. Andy tells Ruth that he is leaving but that he is going to hire some help to run the farm. He also tells Ruth that he loves her like a sister. Ruth is distraught over Andy’s unexpected leaving as well as over the fact that he no longer loves her, and she rebukes him. Andy is confused at these outbursts and thinks he is not wanted. They are interrupted by Captain Scott, who tells Andy a ship is ready to leave for Argentina the next morning. This is the only ship that is going to Argentina for months, so Andy decides to take it. Andy and Captain Scott leave to walk toward the Mayo farmhouse, and Ruth breaks down crying.

 

Act 3, Scene 1

Five years later, the farmhouse is in total decay. Robert, who is obviously sick, talks with Ruth about Andy’s imminent arrival, Mary’s death, his sickness, and their money problems. Ruth puts Robert back to bed and talks to her mother about Jake, the hired hand who has just quit because Robert owed him money. Andy and a medical specialist, Doctor Fawcett, arrive. While the doctor examines Robert, Andy and Ruth talk about Robert’s condition. Ruth says they could not afford to contact Andy sooner and that Robert has steadily lost interest in everything since Mary and his mother died. Andy says he needs to go away again, because he has lost most of his money on speculative investments, but that there is enough left over in his savings to fix the farm. Doctor Fawcett comes out of the room and says that Robert is dying. Robert says that his dying wish is to have Andy marry Ruth, then he goes to lie down again. Andy is confused over this request until Ruth tells Andy about the fight she and Robert had over Andy five years ago. Ruth goes to the bedroom to tell Robert that she does not love Andy and cannot marry him, but Robert has climbed out the window.

 

Act 3, Scene 2

A few minutes later, Robert stumbles into the same section of country road where the play started, although the fields are no longer healthy. Andy and Ruth rush up to Robert, who tells them he wants to die outside. Robert is happy because with his death, he says, he will finally be able to journey beyond the horizon. Robert dies, saying once again that Andy needs to take care of Ruth. Andy looks at Ruth, telling her they have both screwed things up but that perhaps in the future, things will be better, suggesting that maybe they will get married. Ruth, however, is exhausted and gives no sign that she agrees.

 

CHARACTERS

Mrs. Atkins

Mrs. Atkins is Ruth’s widowed, invalid mother, who never forgives her daughter for marrying Robert Mayo instead of Andy. Mrs. Atkins criticizes Robert’s inefficiency in running both the Mayo farm and her farm. She also complains about Ruth and Robert’s sickly child, Mary, who often cries to her mother. Mrs. Atkins is an extremely religious person and says cruelly to Kate Mayo that her husband died early because he was a sinner and that the ill-fated marriage between Robert and Ruth was also a result of God’s will. Although Mrs. Atkins claims in the second act that she is about to die, she outlives many of the other characters and survives until the end of the play. At this point, she is sneaking money to Ruth behind Robert’s back to help pay the bills, since Robert is having a hard time keeping the farm running on his own.

 

Ruth Atkins

Ruth Atkins is Mrs. Atkins’s daughter and the wife of Robert Mayo. In the beginning, she dates Andy, but she falls in love with Robert when he speaks about his dream of going on a sea voyage. As a result, she tells him she does not love Andy and convinces Robert not to go on his voyage. Her choice influences Andy to leave the Mayo farm and take Robert’s place on the voyage, since he cannot bear to see Ruth with another man, especially his brother. As the play goes on, Ruth’s happiness and her ability to love slowly wane. Three years later, Ruth has aged considerably. She and Robert hate each other, and Ruth says she loves Andy. They both agree that if it were not for Mary (their small, sickly child) they would leave each other. Ruth tries to rekindle the flame with Andy when he comes home for a visit, but before she can tell him her feelings, he lets her know that he does not love her anymore. Ruth is hurt and is rude to Andy, who assumes she does not want him around.

 

When Andy comes home again five years later, Mary has died, and Ruth is a broken woman. Like the Mayo farm, her life is in decay, and she sits around while Robert’s health quickly declines. She accepts money from her mother, behind Robert’s back, to help pay the bills. When Robert shows some renewed energy in his feverish state and says that they should move to the city and start over, Ruth is frightened. When Andy comes in with a medical specialist, who tells them that Robert is dying, and Andy blames Ruth, she is too exhausted to fight back. Robert’s dying wish is to have Andy marry Ruth, which Andy suggests at the end of the play. But, Ruth is too exhausted to care and does not indicate whether she will be willing to do this.

Note: Essay from Net Sources

 

Indian Writing in Translation - Essays

Literary Excellence of the Thirukkural   Brevity, Imagery, Metaphor, and Moral Instruction Introduction Tirukkural, composed by Thiruvalluva...